Mommy Madness
: Motherhood in the Age of Anxiety
I was surfing yesterday and found this fantastic
freebie online. It's for a completely free
subscription to Parents magazine. That's pretty
cool! I sign up for mine.
Get a free subscription to Parents Magazine!
We always get tons of question from our visitors "how do a single mom balancing her work, school, taking care of the children and still enjoy life?"
Judith Warner is the author of a range of nonfiction books, among them You Have the Power: How to Take Back Our Country and Restore Democracy in America (with Howard Dean) and the bestselling biography Hillary Clinton: The Inside Story. A former special correspondent for Newsweek in Paris, she reviews books for The Washington Post and has written about politics and women’s issues for magazines including The New Republic and Elle. She lives in Washington, D.C., with her husband and their children.
A lively and provocative look at the modern culture of motherhood and at the social, economic, and political forces that shaped current ideas about parenting. Manic cookie-baking at midnight. Play dates as complicated as peace summits. Mother-of-the-birthday-boy meltdowns. Ambien nights and Ritalin days.
No sex. No nights out. No sleep. Ever.
What’s wrong with this picture? That’s the question Judith Warner asked herself after taking a good, hard look at the world of modern motherhood—at anxious women at work and at home and in bed with unhappy husbands.
Warner, a writer and journalist, returned to the United States after living and becoming a mother abroad and was shocked to find the mothers she met here living lives of quiet desperation. Mothers working outside the home were cruelly burdened with double-duty workdays and nights punctuated by anxiety and guilt; stay-at-home moms often seemed overwhelmed and depressed.
Moving personally between the worlds of stay-at-home and working motherhood, interviewing scores of women nationwide, reading and seeing what our popular culture and politicians had to offer on the subject of motherhood in our time, Warner came to a stark conclusion: that what is happening in the culture of motherhood (and parenthood) now is nothing less than Perfect Madness .
Perfect Madness offers a rich and provocative history of contemporary American culture. It is a thorough examination of why mothers who appear to have everything are feeling exhausted and dissatisfied and powerless. It explores how the current generation of moms became a generation of control freaks convinced they must handle everything alone.
Through close readings of the mainstream press and with a command of dominant ideas in psychology and recent social, political, and economic thought, Warner provides a context in which to understand the way we live now and to imagine an alternative way of life. She argues that all of us—men, women, society at large—need to demand more support for our families: from our government, from our workplaces, and from one another. Smart, far-reaching, plainspoken, and fun,
Perfect Madness is essential reading for anyone hoping to make sense of family life in our time.
What happened when the Girls Who Had It All became mothers? A new book explores why this generation feels so insane
Feb. 21 in the Newsweek issue - Back in the days when I was a Good Mommy, I tried to do everything right. I breast-fed and co-slept, and responded to each and every cry with anxious alacrity. I awoke with my daughter at 6:30 AM and, eschewing TV, curled up on the couch with a stack of books that I could recite in my sleep. I did this, in fact, many times, jerking myself back awake as the clock rounded 6:45 and the words of Curious George started to merge with my dreams.
Was I crazy? No—I was a committed mother, eager to do right by my child and well-versed in the child care teachings of the day. I was proud of the fact that I could get in three full hours of high-intensity parenting before I left for work; prouder still that, when I came home in the evening, I could count on at least three more similarly intense hours to follow. It didn't matter that, in my day job as a stringer for this magazine, I was often falling asleep at my desk. Nor that I'd lost the ability to write a coherent sentence. My brain might have been fried, but my baby's was thriving. I'd seen the proof of that everywhere—in the newsweeklies and the New York Times, on TV, even in the official statements that issued forth from the White House, where First Lady Hillary Clinton herself had endorsed "singing, playing games, reading, storytelling, just talking and listening" as the best ways to enhance a child's development.All around me, the expert advice on baby care, whether it came from the What to Expect books or the legions of "specialists" hawking videos, computer software, smart baby toys or audiotapes to advance brain development, was unanimous: Read! Talk! Sing! And so I talked and I read and I sang and made up stories and did funny voices and narrated car rides ... until one day, when my daughter was about four, I realized that I had turned into a human television set, so filled with 24-hour children's programming that I had no thoughts left of my own.
And when I started listening to the sounds of the Mommy chatter all around me in the playgrounds and playgroups of Washington, D.C.—the shouts of "Good job!," the interventions and facilitations ("What that lady is saying is, she would really prefer you not empty your bucket of sand over her little boy's head. Is that okay with you, honey?")—I realized that I was hardly alone.
Once my daughters began school, I was surrounded, it seemed, by women who had surrendered their better selves—and their sanity—to motherhood. Women who pulled all-nighters hand-painting paper plates for a class party. Who obsessed over the most minute details of playground politics. Who—like myself—appeared to be sleep-walking through life in a state of quiet panic.
Some of the mothers appeared to have lost nearly all sense of themselves as adult women. They dressed in kids' clothes—overall shorts and go-anywhere sandals. They ate kids' foods. They were so depleted by the affection and care they lavished upon their small children that they had no energy left, not just for sex, but for feeling like a sexual being. "That part of my life is completely dead," a working mother of two told me. "I don't even miss it. It feels like it belongs to another life. Like I was another person."
It all reminded me a lot of Betty Friedan's 1963 classic, The Feminine Mystique. The diffuse dissatisfaction. The angst, hidden behind all the obsession with trivia, and the push to be perfect. The way so many women constantly looked over their shoulders to make sure that no one was outdoing them in the performance of good Mommyhood. And the tendency—every bit as pronounced among my peers as it had been for the women Friedan interviewed—to blame themselves for their problems. There was something new, too: the tendency many women had to feel threatened by other women and to judge them harshly—nowhere more evident than on Urbanbaby and other, similarly "supportive" web sites. Can I take my 17-month-old to the Winnie the Pooh movie?, one mom queried recently. "WAY tooooo young," came one response.
I read that 70 percent of American moms say they find motherhood today "incredibly stressful." Thirty percent of mothers of young children reportedly suffer from depression. Nine hundred and nine women in Texas recently told researchers they find taking care of their kids about as much fun as cleaning their house, slightly less pleasurable than cooking, and a whole lot less enjoyable than watching TV.
And I wondered: Why do so many otherwise competent and self-aware women lose themselves when they become mothers? Why do so many of us feel so out of control? And—the biggest question of all—why has this generation of mothers, arguably the most liberated and privileged group of women America has ever seen, driven themselves crazy in the quest for perfect mommy-dom?
I started speaking with women from all over the country, about 150 in all. And I found that the craziness I saw in my own city was nothing less than a nationwide epidemic. Women from Idaho to Oklahoma City to the suburbs of Boston—in middle and upper middle class enclaves where there was time and money to spend—told me of lives spent shuttling back and forth to more and more absurd-seeming, high-pressured, time-demanding, utterly exhausting kids' activities. I heard of whole towns turning out for a spot in the right ballet class; of communities where the competition for the best camps, the best coaches and the best piano teachers rivaled that for admission to the best private schools and colleges. Women told me of their exhaustion and depression, and of their frustrations with the "uselessness" of their husbands. They said they wished their lives could change. But they had no idea of how to make that happen. I began to record their impressions and reflections, and wove them into a book, which I named, in honor of the sentiment that seemed to animate so many of us, Perfect Madness.I think of "us" as the first post-baby boom generation, girls born between 1958 and the early 1970s, who came of age politically in the Carter, Reagan and Bush I years. We are, in many ways, a blessed group. Most of the major battles of the women's movement were fought—and won—in our early childhood. Unlike the baby boomers before us, who protested and marched and shouted their way from college into adulthood, we were a strikingly apolitical group, way more caught up in our own self-perfection as we came of age, than in working to create a more perfect world. Good daughters of the Reagan Revolution, we disdained social activism and cultivated our own gardens with a kind of muscle-bound, tightly wound, über-achieving, all-encompassing, never-failing self-control that passed, in the 1980s, for female empowerment.
We saw ourselves as winners. We'd been bred, from the earliest age, for competition. Our schools had given us co-ed gym and wood-working shop, and had told us never to let the boys drown out our voices in class. Often enough, we'd done better than they had in school. Even in science and math. And our passage into adulthood was marked by growing numbers of women in the professions. We believed that we could climb as high as we wanted to go, and would grow into the adults we dreamed we could be. Other outcomes—like the chance that children wouldn't quite fit into this picture—never even entered our minds.
Why should they have? Back then, when our sense of our potential as women was being formed, there was a general feeling of optimism. Even the most traditional women's magazines throughout the 1980s taught that the future for up-and-coming mothers was bright: The new generation of fathers would help. Good babysitting could be found. Work and motherhood could be balanced. It was all a question of intelligent "juggling." And of not falling prey to the trap of self-sacrifice and perfectionism that had driven so many mothers crazy in the past.
But something happened then, as the 1990s advanced, and the Girls Who Could Have Done Anything grew up into women who found, as the millennium turned, that they couldn't quite ... get it together, or get beyond the stuck feeling that had somehow lodged in their minds.
Life
happened.
We became
mothers. And
found, when we
set out to
"balance" our
lives—and in
particular to
balance some
semblance of the
girls and women
we had been
against the
mothers we'd
become—that
there was no way
to make this
most basic of
"balancing acts"
work. Life was
hard. It was
stressful. It
was expensive.
Jobs—and
children—were
demanding. And
the ambitious
form of
motherhood most
of us wanted to
practice was
utterly
incompatible
with any kind of
outside work, or
friendship, or
life, generally.
One woman I
interviewed was
literally struck
dumb as she
tried to
articulate the
quandary she was
in. She wasn't a
woman who
normally lacked
for words. She
was a newspaper
editor, with a
husband whose
steady income
allowed her many
choices. In the
hope of finding
"balance," she'd
chosen to work
part-time and at
night in order
to spend as much
time as possible
with her
nine-year-old
daughter. But
somehow, nothing
had worked out
as planned.
Working nights
meant that she
was tired all
the time, and
cranky, and
stressed. And
forever annoyed
with her
husband. And now
her daughter was
after her to get
a day job. It
seemed that
having Mom
around most of
the time wasn't
all it was
cracked up to
be, particularly
if Mom was
forever on the
edge.
The woman waved
her hands in
circles,
helplessly.
"What I'm trying
to figure out—"
she paused.
"What I'm trying
to remember ...
Is how I ended
up raising this
princess ... How
I got into ...
How to get out
of ... this,
this, this,
this mess."
Most of us in
this generation
grew up
believing that
we had
fantastic,
unlimited,
freedom of
choice. Yet as
mothers many
women face
"choices" on the
order of: You
can continue to
pursue your
professional
dreams at the
cost of
abandoning your
children to long
hours of
inadequate child
care. Or: You
can stay at home
with your baby
and live in a
state of
virtual,
crazy-making
isolation
because you
can't afford a
nanny, because
there is no such
thing as
part-time day
care, and
because your
husband doesn't
come home until
8:30 at night.
These are
choices that
don't feel like
choices at all.
They are the
harsh realities
of family life
in a culture
that has no
structures in
place to allow
women—and men—to
balance work and
child-rearing.
But most women
in our
generation don't
think to look
beyond
themselves at
the constraints
that keep them
from being able
to make real
choices as
mothers. It
almost never
occurs to them
that they can
use the muscle
of their superb
education or
their collective
voice to change
or rearrange
their social
support system.
They simply
don't have the
political
reflex—or the
vocabulary—to
think of things
in this way.
Some of us may
feel empowered
by the challenge
of taking it all
on, being the
best, as Tea
Leoni's "Spanglish"
character did on
her uphill
morning run, but
really, this
perfectionism is
not empowerment.
It's more like
what some
psychologists
call "learned
helplessness"—an
instinctive
giving-up in the
face of
difficulty that
people do when
they think they
have no real
power. At base,
it's a kind of
despair. A lack
of faith that
change can come
to the outside
world. A lack of
belief in our
political
culture or our
institutions.
They've been
bred to be
independent and
self-sufficient.
To rely on their
own initiative
and "personal
responsibility."
To privatize
their
problems. And
so, they don't
get fired up
about our
country's lack
of affordable,
top-quality
child care. (In
many parts of
the country,
decent child
care costs more
than state
college tuition,
and the quality
of the care that
most families
can afford is
abysmal.) Nor
about the fact
that middle
class life is
now so damn
expensive that
in most families
both parents
must work
gruelingly long
hours just to
make ends meet.
(With fathers
averaging 51
hours per week
and mothers
clocking in at
an average of
41, the U.S.
workweek is now
the longest in
the world.) Nor
about the fact
that in many
districts the
public schools
are so bad that
you can't,
if you want
your child to be
reasonably
well-educated,
sit back and
simply let the
teachers do
their jobs, and
must instead
supplement the
school day with
a panoply of
expensive and
inconvenient
"activities" so
that your kid
will have some
exposure to
music, art and
sports.It
really
needs to change.
For while many
women can and do
manage to accept
(or at least
adjust to) this
situation for
themselves,
there's a twinge
of real sadness
that comes out
when they talk
about their
daughters. As a
forty-something
mother living
and working
part-time in
Washington, D.C.
(and spending a
disproportionate
amount of her
time managing
the details of
her
daughter's—and
her
husband's—life),
mused one
evening to me,
"I look at my
daughter and I
just want to
know: what
happened?
Because look at
us: it's 2002
and nothing's
changed. My
mother expected
my life to be
very different
from hers, but
now it's a lot
more like hers
than I expected,
and from here I
don't see where
it will be
different for my
daughter. I
don't want her
to carry this
crushing burden
that's in our
heads ... [But]
what can make
things
different?"
This
has to change.
We now
have a situation where well-off
women can choose how to live
their lives—either outsourcing
child care at a sufficiently
high level of quality to permit
them to work with relative peace
of mind or staying at home. But
no one else, really, has
anything. Many, many women would
like to stay home with their
children and can't afford to do
so. Many, many others would like
to be able to work part-time but
can't afford or find the way to
do so. Many others would like to
be able to maintain their
full-time careers without either
being devoured by their jobs or
losing ground, and they can't do
that. And there is no hope at
all for any of these women on
the horizon.
Instead of blaming
society, moms today tend to blame themselves.
They say they've chosen poorly. And so they take
on the Herculean task of being absolutely
everything to their children, simply because
no one else is doing anything at all to help
them. Because if they don't perform magical
acts of perfect Mommy ministrations, their kids
might fall through the cracks and end up as
losers in our hard-driving winner-take-all
society.
For real change to
happen, we don't need more politicians sounding
off about "family values." Neither do we need to
pat the backs of working mothers, or "reward"
moms who stay at home, or "valorize" motherhood,
generally, by acknowledging that it's "the
toughest job in the world." We need
solutions—politically palatable, economically
feasible, home-grown American solutions—that
can, collectively, give mothers and families a
break.
-
We need incentives
like tax subsidies to encourage corporations
to adopt family-friendly policies.
-
We need
government-mandated child care standards and
quality controls that can remove the fear
and dread many working mothers feel when
they leave their children with others.
-
We need flexible,
affordable, locally available, high-quality
part-time day care so that stay-at-home moms
can get a life of their own. This shouldn't,
these days, be such a pipe dream. After all,
in his State of the Union message, President
Bush reaffirmed his support of (which, one
assumes, includes support of funding for)
"faith-based and community groups." I lived
in France before moving to Washington, and
there, my elder daughter attended two
wonderful, affordable, top-quality part-time
pre-schools, which were essentially meant to
give stay-at-home moms a helping hand. One
was run by a neighborhood co-op and the
other by a Catholic organization. Government
subsidies kept tuition rates low. A sliding
scale of fees brought some diversity.
Government standards meant that the staffers
were all trained in the proper care of young
children. My then 18-month-old daughter
painted and heard stories and ate cookies
for the sum total in fees of about $150 a
month. (This solution may be French—but do
we have to bash it?)
-
We need new
initiatives to make it possible for mothers
to work part-time (something most mothers
say they want to do) by creating vouchers or
bigger tax credits to make child care more
affordable, by making health insurance
available and affordable for part-time
workers and by generally making life less
expensive and stressful for middle-class
families so that mothers (and fathers) could
work less without risking their children's
financial future. Or even, if they felt the
need, could stay home with their children
for a while.
-
In general, we
need to alleviate the economic pressures
that currently make so many families' lives
so high-pressured, through progressive tax
policies that would transfer our nation's
wealth back to the middle class. So that
mothers and fathers could stop running like
lunatics, and start spending real
quality—and quantity—time with their
children. And so that motherhood could stop
being the awful burden it is for so many
women today and instead become something
more like a joy.
She was in the midst of organizing a
class party. This meant shopping. Color-coordinating paper
goods. Piecework, pre-gluing of arts-and-crafts projects.
Uniformity of felt textures. Of buttons and beads. There were
the phone calls, too. From other parents. With criticism and
"constructive" comments that had her up at night, playing over
conversations in her mind. "I can't take it anymore," she said
to me. "I hate everyone and everything. I am going insane."
I looked at her face, saw her eyes fill
with tears, and in that instant saw the faces of dozens of women
I'd met—and, of course, I saw myself.
And I was reminded of the words of a
French doctor I'd once seen. I'd come to him about headaches.
They were violent. They were constant. And they would prove,
over the next few years, to be chronic. He wrote me a
prescription for a painkiller. But he looked skeptical as to
whether it would really do me much good. "If you keep
banging your head against the wall," he said, "you're
going to have headaches.
I have thought of these words so many times since then.
I have seen so many mothers banging their heads against a wall. And
treating their pain—the chronic headache of their lives—with sleeping pills and
antidepressants and anxiety meds and a more and more potent, more and more
vicious self-and-other-attacking form of anxious perfectionism.
And I hope that somehow we will all
find a way to stop. Because we are not doing ourselves any good.
We are not doing our children—particularly our daughters—any
good. We're not doing our marriages any good. And we're doing
nothing at all for our society.
We are simply beating ourselves black
and blue. So let's take a breather. Throw out the schedules,
turn off the cell phone, cancel the tutors (fire the OT!). Let's
spend some real quality time with our families, just talking,
hanging out, not doing anything for once. And let ourselves
be.
Sources: Newsweek Magazine
From
Perfect
Madness by Judith Warner. To be
published by Riverhead books, a division of Penguin Group (USA) Inc. © 2005 by
Judith Warner.